There's a particular arc I've watched play out in patient after patient. It starts with anxiety — something feels wrong, and they don't yet know what. Then the anxiety of a diagnosis, and often the anxiety of a procedure. Then, if things go well, a slow unclenching: it wasn't that bad, and I'm getting better, and I'm getting better. And then, eventually, the best part of the whole relationship: telling someone they don't need me anymore.
That last moment is the one I'd point to if anyone asked what this work has taught me about mortality. Not the dramatic conversations, though there are those too. The quiet ones — the discharge from ongoing care, the patient who came in afraid and leaves simply living their life again — those are the moments that keep the meaning of the work visible to me, years in.
Working in cardiac electrophysiology means working constantly at the edge of a very specific fact: this organ, more than most, has a direct relationship with how much time someone has left. That fact could make the job grim. In practice, it does something closer to the opposite. It sharpens the question I ask almost every patient early on, in some form — not just how long do you want to live, but what do you want that time to actually look like. Not everybody wants to live longer. Almost everybody wants whatever time they have to be genuinely theirs.
My father died of heart disease when I was five. I spent my professional life, without ever quite intending to, learning to understand the organ that took him. I don't know that this work changes how I think about my own mortality so much as it's given me a very specific, very concrete answer to what a life worth protecting actually looks like — one patient, one goal, one conversation at a time.
← Back to Ideas